Blog Layout

Exploring Agreeance: Nurturing Authentic Accord, Productive Disagreement, and Meaningful Outcomes

Andrew Wood • Jul 04, 2023

Flashback

In 2018, I wrote an article contemplating the nature of agreeance and its various states. In the course of my work, this week, I’ve needed to revisit, refresh and expand upon the concept of agreeance. This overarching term encompasses three distinct states: accord (healthy agreement), discord (conflict), and dys-cord (unhealthy agreement). By delving deeper into these states and embracing the distinction between resolutions and outcomes, we can better understand the dynamics of agreements and how mediators and facilitators can guide parties towards healthier and more authentic outcomes.

Rethinking 'Consensus': Embracing the Power of Disagreement

Traditionally, consensus has been emphasised as an ideal state, with the understanding that parties are of one mind. However, we now recognize that excessive focus on consensus can dull innovation and creativity, limiting adaptability. Preserving independence of thought and engaging in productive disagreement, we can sharpen our decision-making. True accord, which goes beyond mere consensus, is grounded in shared purpose and one's heart connection to that purpose. This type of accord, even in the presence of active disagreements, allows for ongoing collaboration and fruitful engagement, leading to meaningful outcomes.

The Essence of Identity: Authenticity in Accord

Accord not only encompasses the terms of an agreement but also reflects the parties' identity and core beliefs. It is about being authentic and consistent with one's values, those things held "close to the heart." Authenticity establishes a foundation of integrity and purpose, ensuring that actions undertaken in pursuit of the agreement align with the parties’ true selves. By honouring core beliefs, parties foster trust, commitment, and mutual respect, setting the stage for collaboration and the achievement of meaningful outcomes.

Elements That Can Be Lived With; and Elements that Cannot Be Lived Without

Within agreeance, agreements comprise elements that parties can live with and elements they cannot live without. Recognizing this distinction is vital for achieving authentic and sustainable outcomes.


Accord arises when parties find alignment on elements they can live with, representing shared and separate hopes, motivations, and commitments.


Discord emerges when there are active disagreements on elements that parties cannot live with, potentially leading to conflicts.


Dys-cord occurs when parties compromise on elements they cannot live without, resulting in discontent, distrust, and potentially resentment.


By identifying and addressing these essential elements, mediators and facilitators help parties reach agreements that honour their core needs and values while fostering cooperation and achieving meaningful outcomes.

The Evolution of Accord: From Active Disagreement to Meaningful Outcomes

Accord is not merely about resolving specific issues but also about achieving meaningful outcomes that align with the parties' shared purpose. Parties can collaborate and reach satisfactory outcomes even while some disagreements remain unresolved. By maintaining independence of thought, parties can continue to engage in productive disagreement and work towards shared objectives. As the focus shifts to meaningful outcomes and shared purpose, initial disagreements may diminish in importance, allowing for a unified vision that supersedes individual differences.

Conclusion:

By exploring the intricacies of agreeance and embracing the distinction between resolutions and outcomes, we gain a deeper understanding of the collaborative process. Nurturing authentic accord, fostering productive disagreement, and aiming for meaningful outcomes enable parties to reach agreements that respect their identities, core beliefs, and values. Mediators and facilitators play a crucial role in guiding parties towards these outcomes, promoting trust, integrity, and long-lasting cooperation. By fostering an environment that embraces productive disagreement and recognises the power of shared purpose, we unlock the potential for innovation, growth, and the achievement of truly authentic and transformative outcomes.


ACW

by Andrew Wood 12 Mar, 2024
Are you unwittingly outsourcing your data breaches?
by Andrew Wood 05 Mar, 2024
It's time to rethink the Payroll Provider/ Employer of Record Model!
by Andrew Wood 13 Feb, 2024
Future-Proofing Privacy: Strategic Insights for Staffing & Recruitment's Next Chapter
by Andrew Wood 07 Feb, 2024
You might want to rethink the logic of your temp-to-perm fees after you read about this case.
by Andrew Wood 31 Jan, 2024
Recruiters' Research Log: Building Block Concept #4: Research as a Tool for Professional Development
by Andrew Wood 30 Jan, 2024
Recruiters' Research Log: Building Block Concept #3 Fresh Voices
by Andrew Wood 27 Jan, 2024
Building Blocks for the Recruiters Research Log (Concept #2)
by Andrew Wood 26 Jan, 2024
Welcome to our journey towards creating a 'Knowledge Commons' in the field of recruitment. What does this mean? A Knowledge Commons is a shared intellectual space where knowledge, research, and insights are not just disseminated but collaboratively built and accessed by all. Our vision is to create a platform where diverse voices, experiences, and expertise in the staffing and recruitment industry converge. We believe that by breaking down barriers to knowledge, we can foster innovation, inclusivity, and progress. Over the next few days, we'll be revealing key facets of our approach as we prepare to launch our new project, Recruiters' Research Log . Stay tuned as we delve deeper into this exciting concept and invite you to become a part of it. Andrew C. Wood
by Andrew Wood 23 Jan, 2024
From Casebook to Research Log
by Andrew Wood 16 Nov, 2023
If you’re a licensed labour hire provider or operating lawfully in a jurisdiction that doesn’t yet have labour hire licensing, then you probably won’t want to have to compete against unlicensed operators who are avoiding regulatory responsibilities and costs. But take heart. The Queensland and Victorian regulators seem to be stepping up to shut down the shadow operators. Here are notes of a couple of recent prosecutions that show that the regulators mean business. Unlicensed NQ labour hire providers convicted and fined total of $360,000 A North Queensland provider disguised the fact that it was not licensed and misled farmers into believing that arrangements for the supply of its workers were legitimate. Worker complaint leads to big fines for unlicensed supply of security guards A South Australian based security company and its Chief Operating Officer were convicted and fined $150,000 and $50,000 respectively for supplying security guards in Queensland without having a Qld labour hire licence. Over the last few months, the Victorian Labour Hire Authority has also gone on the front foot with several Supreme Court prosecutions of labour hire providers and their directors for alleged: unlicensed trading; and failure to notify changes in directorships I’ll have more to say when the outcomes of these cases are known. In the meantime, it’s important that legitimate labour hire providers don’t just sit by quietly and let these things pas unnoticed. You’ve all got networks. Use them to spread the word about what’s happening so that your workers and clients clearly know where you stand when it comes to dealing with shadow operators. Share these stories and join us in creating a fair and transparent labour hire industry together. Andrew C. Wood
More posts
Share by: