Blog Layout

Puffed Up Policies: Tackling Bloat in Organisational Policies

Andrew Wood • Jul 31, 2023

Have you ever been asked to create an organizational policy in response to the latest 'must-have' legislative provision or in the wake of a sudden 'I wish we'd had one' realization?


Creating such policies can be daunting. We often have to make do with scant guidance apart from a few basic

pointers from new legislation. Or, we're given access to regulatory guidelines, fact sheets, and a wealth of information about “best practice” - but little insight on who is actually observing it.


In these circumstances, we delve into the topic area, pull out what we think is needed (based on our subject matter expertise, or lack of it), and do our best to create something that doesn't leave anything important out.


While doing this, there's that nagging awareness in the back of our minds. We know regulation is made

up of rules, exceptions, exceptions-to-exceptions, glosses, and interpretations. We understand that a proposition that is 70% right is probably 30% wrong and that's where our policy stakeholders are likely to get caught out … there and in the space where they will only ever retain 20% of what they read … if they read it at all.


Not surprisingly, we often fall victim to policy bloat. After all, who ever got sacked or sued for providing too much information in an HR policy? And if somebody wants to take out one of our meticulously drafted inclusions, then on their own heads be it!


So, this week, let’s tackle policy bloat – the phenomenon of creating policies that have grown so complex and extensive that they deter, rather than encourage, understanding. I want to talk about how we can apply learning design principles to craft policies that effectively communicate their purpose and expectations to the audiences they are intended for.


What's your take on this? Are there some types of organizational policies that are more susceptible to

policy bloat than others? How are you managing them?


I invite you to share your experiences and strategies for dealing with policy bloat in the comments. Let's get this conversation started!



ACW - In collaboration with OpenAI's ChatGPT

This piece was co-created to bring you the best of human & AI insights.

by Andrew Wood 12 Mar, 2024
Are you unwittingly outsourcing your data breaches?
by Andrew Wood 05 Mar, 2024
It's time to rethink the Payroll Provider/ Employer of Record Model!
by Andrew Wood 13 Feb, 2024
Future-Proofing Privacy: Strategic Insights for Staffing & Recruitment's Next Chapter
by Andrew Wood 07 Feb, 2024
You might want to rethink the logic of your temp-to-perm fees after you read about this case.
by Andrew Wood 31 Jan, 2024
Recruiters' Research Log: Building Block Concept #4: Research as a Tool for Professional Development
by Andrew Wood 30 Jan, 2024
Recruiters' Research Log: Building Block Concept #3 Fresh Voices
by Andrew Wood 27 Jan, 2024
Building Blocks for the Recruiters Research Log (Concept #2)
by Andrew Wood 26 Jan, 2024
Welcome to our journey towards creating a 'Knowledge Commons' in the field of recruitment. What does this mean? A Knowledge Commons is a shared intellectual space where knowledge, research, and insights are not just disseminated but collaboratively built and accessed by all. Our vision is to create a platform where diverse voices, experiences, and expertise in the staffing and recruitment industry converge. We believe that by breaking down barriers to knowledge, we can foster innovation, inclusivity, and progress. Over the next few days, we'll be revealing key facets of our approach as we prepare to launch our new project, Recruiters' Research Log . Stay tuned as we delve deeper into this exciting concept and invite you to become a part of it. Andrew C. Wood
by Andrew Wood 23 Jan, 2024
From Casebook to Research Log
by Andrew Wood 16 Nov, 2023
If you’re a licensed labour hire provider or operating lawfully in a jurisdiction that doesn’t yet have labour hire licensing, then you probably won’t want to have to compete against unlicensed operators who are avoiding regulatory responsibilities and costs. But take heart. The Queensland and Victorian regulators seem to be stepping up to shut down the shadow operators. Here are notes of a couple of recent prosecutions that show that the regulators mean business. Unlicensed NQ labour hire providers convicted and fined total of $360,000 A North Queensland provider disguised the fact that it was not licensed and misled farmers into believing that arrangements for the supply of its workers were legitimate. Worker complaint leads to big fines for unlicensed supply of security guards A South Australian based security company and its Chief Operating Officer were convicted and fined $150,000 and $50,000 respectively for supplying security guards in Queensland without having a Qld labour hire licence. Over the last few months, the Victorian Labour Hire Authority has also gone on the front foot with several Supreme Court prosecutions of labour hire providers and their directors for alleged: unlicensed trading; and failure to notify changes in directorships I’ll have more to say when the outcomes of these cases are known. In the meantime, it’s important that legitimate labour hire providers don’t just sit by quietly and let these things pas unnoticed. You’ve all got networks. Use them to spread the word about what’s happening so that your workers and clients clearly know where you stand when it comes to dealing with shadow operators. Share these stories and join us in creating a fair and transparent labour hire industry together. Andrew C. Wood
More posts
Share by: